Home Gear This is Why the Canon 1D X Mark III Scored so Badly...

This is Why the Canon 1D X Mark III Scored so Badly on DXOMark

On Monday, we reported on the controversially low score that DXOMark gave to the Canon 1D X Mark III. The brand new camera somehow scored worse in every category than its predecessor, the Mark II. Now we know why.

When we were preparing our initial report on the confusing results, we reached out to DXOMark to see if they could explain why the camera scored as low as it did. Earlier today, we received a response from Marketing Communications Director Anwesha Ghosh, who shared info from the company’s experts that sheds some light on the results.

“Portrait and Landscape scores result mainly from high Color Sensitivity (CS) and Dynamic Range (DR) measurements almost always at native (lowest ISO setting),” explains Ghosh. “The Canon EOS-1D X Mark III has a native ISO of 136 which is very high compared to its predecessor the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II which is at 63.”

You can see this illustrated clearly in the chart below, which DXOMark shared with PetaPixel over email. Measured ISO vs Manufacturer ISO is simply worse on the 1DX Mark III:

This also explains the Low Light ISO score, which is based primarily on Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Color Sensitivity, and Dynamic Range measurements. The difference of “approximately 1/3 of a stop” in the SNR measurement between the two DSLRs explains the 1/3 of a stop difference in the Low-Light ISO score.

So… what does that mean in practice? As Ghosh tells PetaPixel, not much:

At equivalent ISO measurements the two DSLRs generate very similar results in DR, TR and CS. Which means that when in use, the two DSLRs give identical results other than in the best possible conditions where the Mark II has an advantage on account of its better performing native ISO.

To DXOMark’s credit, the explanation is right there in the review.

“Although manufacturers have been improving sensor sensitivity in new models, it is important to keep in mind that in general, the increases in maximum dynamic range and color depth over the last few years have come from lower ISO settings,” reads the intro to the Image Quality section.

So while Canon has packed some killer features into the 1D X Mark III that make it well-worth the upgrade for sports shooters, the measured native ISO simply falls short of its predecessor. As a result, sensor-specific tests like DXO’s show the camera losing across the board. What you do with that data… that’s up to you.

Image credits: Header image by Kal Visuals, CC0


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Comparing Canon’s New RF 85mm f/1.2 Against the Old EF Version

The guys over at DPReview TV recently set out to test the new Canon RF 85mm f/1.2L lens. But instead of simply shooting some...

This Instagram Copyright Infringement Notice is a Phishing Scam

If you ever receive a direct message on Instagram informing you that copyright infringement has been detected in your photos, beware: it may actually...

The Importance of Self-Development as a Photographer

I originally wrote this post in response to a challenge about growth in a Facebook photographer help group. Members of the group were challenged...

Freaky Photo Fallacies

For this Photo Tip of the Week, I want to lighten things up a bit yet still provide information that can up your photo...

12 Tips for Abstract Landscape Photography

The grand landscapes are beautiful to view and probably the reason you got into landscape photography but the smaller details and intimate scenes can...