Home Gear Film Simulation vs Actual Film: Fuji ACROS Comparison

Film Simulation vs Actual Film: Fuji ACROS Comparison

The recent release of the Fujifilm XPro3 camera coincided with me getting some recently re-released Fujifilm ACROS 100II film. Given my love of Fujifilm digital cameras, film photography, and ACROS film, I desperately wanted to shoot and compare the new XPro3 alongside a rangefinder film camera.

Fortunately, the good people at Fujifilm Australia were kind enough to send me a XPro3 to use for a couple of weeks to satiate my desire.

For the film setup, I dusted off a Yashica Electro 35 GSN with a 45mm f/1.7 lens, placed a red filter on the lens. and loaded in some Fujifilm ACROS 100II 35mm film. On the digital side, since the XPro3 is a crop-sensor camera, I attached a 27mm (41mm full-frame equivalent) f/2.8 lens and dialed in the ACROS-R film simulation.

The -R is the ACROS simulation with a simulated red filter, so in theory, I had two rangefinders with very similar specs.

I threw both cameras in my car and carried them around for the 2 weeks, pulling them out to take identical photos around my home on Phillip Island, Australia. Once 36 exposures were taken, I used a stand developing method with a 1:100 Rodinal solution to develop the film and scanned the images on an Epson V550 scanner.

Here’s the big reveal – image comparisons. The top or left image is the 35mm ACROS 100II image and the bottom or right image is the ACROS -R JPG digital image (click for higher resolution):

These shots look pretty similar to me. I think Fujfilm did a great job on the ACROS digital film simulation. I was surprised the shots were similar in look and feel; however, they do exemplify the differences between digital and film. From these images I have a much greater appreciation for the way film preserves and manages highlights. They look superb. Of course the digital sensor excels at shadow recovery, even in a jpg file.

As for the XPro3, I like the rangefinder feel especially when using the optical viewfinder. It does help to recreate a film shooting aesthetic. I probably would not use this camera out shooting landscapes or as a serious wildlife/sports camera, as I found the rear LCD cumbersome when flipped down as I changed camera orientation, and it did not have the same balance and feel as my X-T3 when I attached a 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6.

However, it’s a super fun camera to shoot. I reckon it would excel as a street shooter and add a little interest and fun to the digital experience.

Which images do you prefer?

About the author: Dale Rogers is a Phillip Island, Australia-based photographer and co-founder of Photo Rangers. To see more of his work, visit their website or give Photo Rangers a follow on Instagram and Facebook. A longer version of this post was originally published here.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Fix “Perspective Distortions” with One Surprising Ps Filter!

Discover a Quick and EASY way to fix "perspective distortions" from your photos with Photoshop's Camera Raw Filter! 🎯 SUBSCRIBE to get more amazing Photoshop...

Turn Your Photos Into Gold Statues in Photoshop [Quick & Easy!]

In this video, you’re going to learn an easy step-by-step process to turn anything into gold in Photoshop! The process is simple. All you need...

The Trick For Perfect “Masks” In Photoshop’s Camera Raw!

The perfect technique to create precise targeted adjustments in Photoshop's Camera Raw! 🎯 SUBSCRIBE to get more amazing Photoshop tutorials! ► https://www.youtube.com/user/photoshoptrainingch?sub_confirmation=1 📘 INDEX - Use the...

My TWO-STEP PROCESS For Better Cut Outs! – Photoshop Select and Mask Crash Course

In this tutorial, you will learn my TWO-STEP PROCESS to cut out anything in Photoshop! You will learn to extract a foreground from a...

Edit FASTER With This Effective Photoshop Trick: Same Document In Two Windows – 90 Second Tip #09

In this tutorial, you will learn how to open the same document in two windows! This amazing trick will help you edit faster because you...